According to Republic Act 4136, also known as the Land Transportation and Traffic Code, overtaking on a crest of a grade or upon a curve where the view of a driver is obstructed within a distance of 500 feet ahead is generally prohibited, especially on a highway. It’s unsafe and prohibited by law. It is also highly risky and is the perfect recipe for head-on collisions and other accidents. After all, curves in the road can obscure the view of what lies ahead, leaving the driver with limited visibility of oncoming traffic and making it challenging to assess the safety of overtaking.

But, overtaking is not always prohibited. The Land Transportation Office (LTO) has accepted it as a necessary but risky maneuver. It’s allowed in certain situations, but it has to be done properly. Even overtaking on a curve or a hill may be allowed in certain situations. After all, the goal of LTO regulations is to simply prevent accidents and collisions, and ensure the smooth flow of traffic. 

Overtaking Rules under the Republic Act 4136

Since 1964, Republic Act 4136 has been basically serving as the bible for land transportation and traffic regulation in the country. The law encompasses various aspects of road safety, vehicle registration, and driver conduct. It also addresses going past another car under Article II, Sections 39-41: Overtaking and Passing a Vehicle, and Turning at Intersections. 

These sections cover the following LTO rules and regulations on overtaking and  passing vehicles on Philippine roads:

Passing Safely

If you want to go past a car in front of you, you should do it on the left side, and make sure you are far enough away from that car. After passing, you shouldn’t go back to the right side of the road until you are completely safe and clear of the other car.

Being Passed

If another car is coming up behind you and wants to pass, you should let them by. The driver will probably give a signal, like honking the horn, to let you know they want to pass. Don’t speed up until the other car has safely gone past you.

No Passing in Certain Places

There are some places where it’s not safe to pass other vehicles. For example, you shouldn’t overtake on a curve or a hill where you can’t see far ahead. Also, you should never pass another car near a railway crossing or at an intersection unless it’s allowed by traffic signals or someone like a police officer says it’s okay.

Watch for Signs

Sometimes, there are signs on the road that tell you if it’s okay to pass or not. If you see signs saying you can’t pass, it’s important to follow those rules.

Overtaking Rules on a Curve

According to Article II, Section 41(b) of the Land Transportation and Traffic Code, here are some specific rules to observe when overtaking on a curve:

Overtaking Rules

• You can’t pass another car when you’re about to go over the top of a hill (crest of a grade) or on a curve in the road. 
• If you can’t see clearly for at least 500 feet ahead of you, it’s a no-go.
• You’re not allowed to overtake any vehicle when you’re approaching a railway crossing to make sure everyone stays safe, especially when there’s a train nearby.
• Generally, you shouldn’t overtake at intersections, unless there are traffic signals, a watchman, or a police officer guiding the traffic. 
• There are certain areas on the road marked as “no-passing zones” where overtaking is not allowed for safety purposes. 
• Passing between points marked by temporary warning signs or in areas where roadwork is happening is also a big no as there might be changes or obstacles on the road.

Exceptions on Multiple Lanes

But here’s the thing – if you’re on a road with two or more lanes going in the same direction, then you can overtake or pass another vehicle, even on a hill or a curve. In this case, you have more space to do it safely.

Business or Residential Districts

Now, in areas with a bunch of buildings or houses (business or residential districts) where there are two or more lanes going in the same direction, you can pass another vehicle on the right side. It’s like having more options to maneuver.

Enforcement by the Land Transportation Office (LTO) 

The Land Transportation Office plays a pivotal role in enforcing Republic Act 4136, including the overtaking rules. Through rigorous monitoring, roadside inspections, and educational campaigns, the LTO aims to ensure compliance with traffic regulations, including the prohibition from overtaking on curves. Strict enforcement is essential to maintain order on the roads and safeguard the well-being of both drivers and pedestrians.

Educational Initiatives

In addition to enforcement, the LTO enforces the need for comprehensive educational initiatives to raise awareness about the dangers of overtaking on curves. Public campaigns, driver education programs, and information dissemination efforts contribute to creating a culture of responsible driving. Understanding the rationale behind this prohibition fosters a sense of shared responsibility among motorists.

Implications for Drivers

Drivers are expected to adhere to the prohibition on overtaking on a curve to avoid accidents and promote a smoother flow of traffic. Violating this rule can result in penalties, fines, and even the suspension of driving privileges. It is crucial for motorists to exercise prudence and patience, especially when navigating winding roads or blind curves.

Fines and Penalties

For violations like illegal overtaking, overtaking at unsafe distance, cutting an overtaken vehicle, failure to give way to an overtaking vehicle, increasing speed when being overtaken, overtaking when left side is not visible or clear of oncoming traffic, overtaking upon a crest of a grade, overtaking upon a curve, overtaking at any railway grade crossing, overtaking at an intersection, overtaking on “men working” or “caution” sign, and overtaking at no overtaking zone, you will be fined: Php 1,000.

Summary 

Overtaking on a curve poses inherent risks, as the driver’s line of sight is limited, increasing the likelihood of collisions. But, according to Republic Act 4136—the cornerstone in shaping responsible driving habits—the prohibition from overtaking on a curve, as outlined in this legislation, may be allowed under the right conditions, like if the driver has a clear line of sight, there’s no oncoming traffic, and the driver can ensure the safety of the maneuver like on roads with multiple lanes going on the same direction. In such cases, the law does not have anything against overtaking, even on curves or hills. The idea is to make sure that it is safe to pass and that you avoid doing it in tricky or dangerous spots and fulfill the drivers’ legal obligation and shared commitment to keeping the roads safe for everyone.

In an ongoing effort to enhance road safety, the Land Transportation Office (LTO) in the Philippines has implemented a stricter and more credible way to test for intoxicated drivers and take them off the roads. According to the Anti-Drunk and Drugged Driving Law (Republic Act 10586), motorists who are caught indiscriminately swerving, lane straddling, or overspeeding without regard for caution and safety of others will be asked to alight from his vehicle for the field sobriety test. 

The LTO 3-field sobriety test is a set of tasks that law enforcement officers use to check a driver’s physical and cognitive responses. First, there’s the Walk-and-Turn Test. It’s like walking a straight path, turning around, and coming back. They look at things like balance, coordination, and following instructions. Then, there’s the One-Leg Stand Test. It’s all about standing on one leg while keeping the other one up for a bit. They’re checking balance and focus. And lastly, there’s the Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN) Test. It’s about tracking a small object with your eyes. Any uncontrolled eye movement could mean there’s impairment.

By employing the Field Sobriety Test, the LTO hopes to deter driving under the influence and  promote responsible driving across the archipelago. There law also states that in the spirit of fair justice for all, all apprehending vehicles will have a camera onboard to capture the swerving, lane straddling, overspeeding, and other violations suggestive of intoxication—the main probable cause of LTO apprehension for field sobriety testing.

The Anti-Drunk and Drugged Driving Law and the LTO Field Sobriety Tests

The Anti-Drunk and Drugged Driving Law (Republic Act 10586), enacted on May 27, 2013, with implementing rules and regulations (IRR) issued on April 28, 2014, is a Philippine law designed to enhance road safety by promoting responsible driving. The law covers driving under the influence of alcohol, dangerous drugs, or similar substances. It empowers law enforcement agencies, including the Land Transportation Office (LTO) and the Philippine National Police (PNP), to acquire and deploy testing equipment for alcohol and drug detection.

Traffic enforcement officers can be deputized to enforce the law, with the authority to flag down vehicles, conduct field sobriety tests, and apprehend violators, including impounding their vehicles if blood alcohol concentration exceeds the prescribed limit. The law underscores the state’s commitment to safeguarding lives, property, and the general welfare of the people. 

As part of the implementing procedures for RA 10686, the IRR includes detailed provisions related to the LTO field sobriety tests and the standard procedures for its implementation. 

Standard Procedure

The LTO Field Sobriety Test is a standardized procedure designed to assess a driver’s level of impairment due to alcohol consumption. It was designed to assess a driver’s level of impairment, specifically due to alcohol and drug consumption by checking the tell-tale elements of intoxication. Conducted by law enforcement officers during routine traffic stops or checkpoints, the test comprises various physical and cognitive tasks aimed at revealing signs of intoxication.

Key Elements

By evaluating certain elements, the LTO Field Sobriety Tests help law enforcement officers identify drivers who may be operating a vehicle under the influence of alcohol, contributing to road safety and the prevention of impaired driving incidents. In particular, the tests aim to detect signs of intoxication that may affect a driver’s ability to operate a vehicle safely using the following key elements:

• Balance and Coordination

Tests such as the Walk-and-Turn and One-Leg Stand evaluate a driver’s ability to maintain balance and coordination. Impairment can lead to difficulty in performing these physical tasks.

• Eye Movements (Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus – HGN Test)

The HGN Test examines involuntary jerking of the eyes as they track a moving object horizontally. This can indicate alcohol impairment, as alcohol consumption often affects smooth eye movements.

• Cognitive Function

Following instructions and performing tasks that require concentration, such as the Walk-and-Turn, provide insights into a driver’s cognitive function. Impairment may result in an inability to follow directions accurately.

• Motor Skills

The ability to stand on one leg for a specified period, as assessed in the One-Leg Stand test, measures a driver’s motor skills. Impairment can manifest as instability or difficulty maintaining the required posture.

• Reaction Time

While not explicitly tested, impairment due to alcohol consumption can lead to slower reaction times. This aspect is indirectly assessed through the overall performance on the field sobriety tests.

Significance of the LTO Field Sobriety Test 

• Deterrence: The implementation of the LTO Field Sobriety Test serves as a powerful deterrent against driving under the influence, promoting responsible behavior and discouraging potential offenders.
• Road Safety: By swiftly identifying impaired drivers, the test contributes to enhanced road safety, reducing the risk of accidents and ensuring the well-being of all road users.
• Legal Consequences: Failing the LTO Field Sobriety Test can result in legal repercussions, including fines, license suspension, and even imprisonment. These consequences emphasize the seriousness of driving under the influence.

Three Field Components of the LTO Field Sobriety Test

There are three parts to the LTO Field Sobriety Test. The test itself is done with all these three types of tests together. Failing even one of them would mean failing the Field Sobriety Test, which, in turn would mean that the driver will have to undergo either a mandatory test via the alcohol breath analyzer (ABA) or a mandatory drug test. 

1. Walk-and-Turn

Drivers are instructed to take a specified number of steps along a straight line, turn on one foot, and return in the opposite direction. This assesses balance, coordination, and the ability to follow instructions.

2. One-Leg Stand

Drivers must stand on one leg while keeping the other raised for a designated period. This task evaluates balance and concentration, providing officers with insights into a driver’s motor skills.

3. Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN) Test

Law enforcement officers use a pen or small object to observe the driver’s eye movements as they track its horizontal motion. Involuntary jerking of the eyes may indicate impairment.

Important Considerations

For your reference, here are some things considered upon implementation of the LTO Field Sobriety Test:

• Standardization: The LTO Field Sobriety Tests are standardized procedures designed to ensure consistency in assessment. This standardization helps in reliably identifying signs of impairment across different law enforcement interactions.
• Training for Law Enforcement: Proper training for law enforcement officers conducting the tests is crucial. Officers need to be well-versed in administering and interpreting the results to maintain the accuracy and fairness of the tests.
• Environmental Factors: Environmental conditions, such as uneven terrain or poor lighting, can influence a driver’s performance on the tests. Consideration of these factors is important to avoid potential misinterpretations of test results.
• Medical Considerations: Certain medical conditions or disabilities can affect a driver’s ability to perform the tests accurately. Law enforcement should be mindful of these considerations and take them into account during assessments.
• Communication and Consent: Clear communication is essential during the testing process. Drivers should be informed about the nature of the tests, and their consent should be obtained before proceeding. Transparent communication helps build trust and cooperation.
• Documentation: Thorough documentation of the testing process is critical. Officers should record the details of each test, including the driver’s performance and any relevant observations. This documentation serves as crucial evidence in legal proceedings.
• Legal Implications: Understanding the legal implications of the LTO Field Sobriety Tests is vital for both law enforcement and drivers. Awareness of the potential consequences of failing the tests underscores the seriousness of driving under the influence.
• Privacy and Rights: Respect for the privacy and rights of drivers is paramount. Law enforcement should conduct tests in a manner that upholds individual rights, and drivers should be informed of their rights during the testing process.
• Continued Evaluation and Adaptation: The effectiveness of the LTO Field Sobriety Tests should be subject to ongoing evaluation. Regular reviews and updates to the testing procedures based on emerging research and best practices help enhance their reliability.
• Public Awareness: Educating the public about the purpose and procedures of the LTO Field Sobriety Tests contributes to a culture of responsible driving. Increased awareness helps drivers understand the importance of complying with these tests for the safety of all road users.

Video: How to Test a Person Driving Under the Influence

Here’s a video demonstrating how law enforcement officers conduct the Field Sobriety Test on a driver suspected of driving under the influence. This video is a great visual representation of what a driver can expect during a field sobriety exam.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

For your reference, here are some of the most commonly asked questions and answers about the LTO field sobriety tests:

1. What are the three LTO field sobriety tests?

The three main LTO field sobriety tests are the Walk-and-Turn, One-Leg Stand, and Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN) Test. These tests assess physical coordination, balance, and eye movements to detect signs of impairment due to alcohol consumption.

2. How does the Walk-and-Turn test work?

During the Walk-and-Turn test, drivers are required to take a specified number of steps along a straight line, turn, and return. Law enforcement officers assess a driver’s ability to follow instructions, maintain balance, and coordinatie movements.

3. What is the One-Leg Stand test?

In the One-Leg Stand test, drivers stand on one leg while keeping the other raised for a designated period. This test evaluates balance, concentration, and the ability to maintain a stable posture.

4. Explain the Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN) Test.

The HGN Test involves using a pen or small object to track a driver’s eye movements as they follow its horizontal motion. Involuntary jerking of the eyes during this test may indicate impairment.

5. Why is the Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN) Test important?

The HGN Test is crucial as it can reveal involuntary eye jerking, which is often a strong indicator of alcohol impairment. It provides law enforcement with a more objective measure of a driver’s level of intoxication.

6. What happens if a driver fails the LTO field sobriety tests?

Failing the LTO field sobriety tests or at least one of the three field sobriety tests will mean that the driver will have to undergo the Alcohol Breath Analyzer (ABA) test for suspected drunk drivers and mandatory drug testing for suspected drugged drivers. A positive result that proves consumption of alcohol or dangerous drugs will then lead to legal consequences, including fines, license suspension, and potential imprisonment. These consequences emphasize the serious nature of driving under the influence.

7. Are the LTO field sobriety tests mandatory for all drivers?

Yes, the LTO field sobriety tests are mandatory for all drivers when requested by law enforcement officers during routine traffic stops or checkpoints. Refusal to take the tests may result in legal consequences.

8. How often are these tests conducted by the LTO?

The frequency of LTO field sobriety tests varies, but they are commonly conducted during traffic stops, checkpoints, and other situations where law enforcement suspects a driver may be under the influence.

9. Can medical conditions affect the results of these tests?

Certain medical conditions or physical impairments may impact a driver’s performance on the tests. It’s important to communicate any relevant medical information to law enforcement officers if applicable.

10. What is the penalty for drivers who passed the required Field Sobriety Tests Philippines?

If the driver passes all of the three (3) field sobriety tests: The driver shall be issued traffic tickets only for the traffic offense that got him pulled over for. If the driver fails any of the sobriety tests: The driver is then subjected to the breathalyzer or ABA test.

Summary

The LTO Field Sobriety Test stands as a crucial tool in the Philippines’ commitment to creating safer roadways. By combining standardized procedures with the latest insights in impairment detection, the test not only helps keep intoxicated drivers off the streets but also underscores the importance of responsible driving. As technology and law enforcement strategies continue to evolve, the LTO Field Sobriety Test remains a pivotal element in the broader framework of ensuring a secure and responsible driving culture in the Philippines.

In the Philippines, the use of mobile phones while driving is regulated by Republic Act No. 10913, commonly known as the “Anti-Distracted Driving Act.” Enacted in 2017, this legislation aims to curb the rising incidents of accidents caused by distracted driving, with mobile phone use identified as a significant contributing factor.

Also Read: How to Check LTO Violations, Penalties and Fines Online

Under the Anti-Distracted Driving Act, drivers are prohibited from using their mobile phones for calling, texting, playing games, watching videos, and other similar activities while operating a vehicle. The law also covers the use of electronic devices for navigation purposes, emphasizing the importance of keeping one’s focus on the road.

Overview of the Mobile Landscape in the Philippines

Mobile phone usage in the Philippines is deeply ingrained in the fabric of society, fostering connectivity, communication, and access to information. As technology continues to evolve, mobile phone usage in the Philippines has experienced a tremendous surge, transforming the archipelago into a tech-savvy nation with widespread connectivity. It is likely to see further innovations in mobile services, contributing to the country’s progress in the digital age.

In this fast-paced world where staying connected is a priority for many, even while on the go, here’s how the mobile landscape in the Philippines looks like:

• Penetration and Ownership: Mobile phones have become ubiquitous across the Philippines. The archipelago boasts a high mobile penetration rate, with a significant portion of the population owning at least one mobile device. Smartphones, in particular, have gained popularity due to their multifunctionality.
• Internet Connectivity: With the rise of affordable data plans, the majority of mobile phone users in the Philippines access the internet on their devices. This increased connectivity has facilitated access to information, social media, and online services.
• Social Media Dominance: Social media platforms play a crucial role in the daily lives of Filipinos. Apps like Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter are widely used for communication, sharing content, and staying informed about local and global events.
• Text Messaging Culture: While smartphone usage is prevalent, traditional text messaging (SMS) remains a significant mode of communication. Many mobile phone users rely on text messages for quick and cost-effective communication.
• Mobile Banking and Transactions: The Philippines has seen a surge in mobile banking and digital transactions. Mobile wallets and banking apps have gained popularity, allowing users to conduct financial transactions conveniently from their phones.
• Mobile Gaming Enthusiasm: Filipinos have shown a growing interest in mobile gaming. The accessibility of smartphones has contributed to the popularity of mobile games, with many users engaging in gaming activities on their devices.
• Government Initiatives: The Philippine government has recognized the importance of digital connectivity and has initiated programs to improve internet infrastructure and accessibility, aiming to bridge the digital divide and bring the benefits of technology to more citizens.
• Challenges: Despite the advancements, challenges such as network connectivity in rural areas and the cost of smartphones and data plans for some segments of the population still exist. Efforts continue to address these issues and make mobile technology more inclusive.
• Impact on Society: Mobile phones have not only transformed communication but have also played a significant role in various aspects of Filipino society, including education, healthcare, and business. The ability to access information and services on mobile devices has contributed to the overall development of the nation.

Mobile Phone Usage and RA 10913: Anti-Distracted Driving Act (ADDA) 

In the Philippines, the use of mobile phones while driving is regulated by Republic Act No. 10913, commonly known as the “Anti-Distracted Driving Act.” Enacted in May 2017, this law aims to curb the rising incidents of accidents caused by distracted driving and to enhance road safety by discouraging practices like using mobile communication devices which diverts a driver’s attention from the task at hand – operating a vehicle safely. Having said that, ADDA explicitly prohibits the use of mobile communication devices for texting, calling, or engaging in any form of entertainment while driving.

To provide clarity, the law defines a “mobile communication device” as any handheld device used for communication, entertainment, or information processing, which includes smartphones and tablets. While the ADDA prohibits drivers from using their mobile phones for calling, texting, playing games, watching videos, and other similar activities while operating a vehicle, the law also covers the use of electronic devices for navigation purposes, emphasizing the importance of keeping one’s focus on the road.

It does allow the use of these devices if they are in a hands-free mode, such as using a Bluetooth earpiece or a speakerphone function.

Dangers of Using Mobile Phones While Driving

Using mobile phones while driving in the Philippines poses significant dangers, contributing to road accidents and jeopardizing the safety of both drivers and pedestrians. Here are some key dangers associated with this practice:

• Distraction from Driving

The primary danger is the distraction caused by operating a mobile phone while driving. Diverting attention to text messages, calls, or other applications can lead to delayed reaction times and impaired decision-making, increasing the risk of accidents.

• Increased Accident Risk

Engaging with a mobile phone diverts a driver’s focus from the road, making them more prone to collisions, rear-end accidents, and other traffic incidents. The split-second distraction caused by looking at a screen can result in severe consequences.

• Impaired Cognitive Function

Using a mobile phone while driving divides a driver’s cognitive resources between the task of driving and the demands of the phone. This cognitive load can impair concentration, making it difficult to respond effectively to changing road conditions.

• Violation of Traffic Laws

In the Philippines, the Anti-Distracted Driving Act prohibits the use of mobile communication devices while driving. Violating this law can lead to fines, penalties, and even the suspension of driving privileges, adding legal consequences to the inherent dangers.

• Increased Likelihood of Fatalities

Accidents resulting from mobile phone use can have severe consequences, including injuries and fatalities. Pedestrians and other motorists are also at risk when drivers are distracted, making it crucial to prioritize undivided attention to the road.

• Texting and Driving

Texting while driving is particularly hazardous, as it involves visual, manual, and cognitive distractions simultaneously. Reading or sending text messages takes a driver’s eyes off the road, hands off the wheel, and focuses away from driving.

• Road Safety Concerns

The dangers of mobile phone use while driving contribute to broader road safety concerns. Addressing this issue is essential for creating a safer driving environment and reducing the overall number of accidents on Philippine roads.

• Enforcement Challenges

While laws are in place to discourage mobile phone use while driving, enforcement can be challenging. Strict implementation and public awareness campaigns are necessary to ensure that drivers understand the risks and consequences of using mobile phones on the road.

• Technology as a Solution

The use of technology, such as hands-free devices and Bluetooth systems, can mitigate some dangers associated with mobile phone use. However, it’s crucial for drivers to use these technologies responsibly, minimizing distractions.

ADDA Violation and Penalties 

Violating the Anti-Distracted Driving Act can result in fines and penalties, ranging from monetary fines to the suspension of driver’s license and the associated driving privileges, depending on the severity of the offense. Public awareness campaigns have been conducted to educate drivers about the risks associated with distracted driving and the legal consequences of using mobile phones which violates the Anti-Distracted Driving Act (ADDA). 

The law explicitly mentioned the following fines and penalties when it comes to violations related to the use of mobile phones while driving:

• First offense: a fine of five thousand pesos (Php5,000) 
• Second offense: a fine of ten thousand pesos (Php10,000), and 
• Third offense: a fine of fifteen thousand pesos (Php15,000), plus a three-month suspension of driver’s license
• Beyond the third offense:  a fine of twenty thousand pesos (Php20,000), plus the revocation of driver’s license

Exemptions

As per the law, the use of a mobile communication or electronic computing device is exempt from being categorized as distracted driving when:

• Done with the assistance of hands-free features or comparable devices like:
  • Speakerphone
  • Earphones
  • Microphones
• Placing emergency calls to authorities under circumstances involving:
  • Crime
  • Accidents
  • Bomb threats
  • Terrorist threats
  • Fires
  • Explosions
• Responding to emergency calls to authorities under situations including:
  • Crime
  • Accidents
  • Bomb threats
  • Terrorist threats
  • Fires
  • Explosions
  • Requiring immediate medical attention
  • When personal safety and security are compromised

In an effort to strike a balance between connectivity and road safety, the Philippines encourages the use of hands-free devices for communication and navigation while driving. This approach aligns with global efforts to mitigate the dangers of distracted driving by promoting technology that allows drivers to stay connected without compromising their attention on the road.

Implementation Challenges

While the Anti-Distracted Driving Act was enacted with good intentions, many people still see it as a restriction. Like any law or restriction, enforcement remains a challenge. In fact, despite the clear regulations in place, the issue of using mobile phones while driving is a subject of concern, not just for the safety of individuals on the road but also for legal implications. Some drivers continue to engage in distracting activities while driving, putting themselves and others at risk. Some argue that the law should be more comprehensive, addressing other distractions beyond mobile phones. On the other hand, supporters believe that the focus on mobile phone usage is a crucial step towards creating a safer driving environment. Law enforcement agencies, on the other hand, regularly conduct operations to catch and penalize offenders, but the effectiveness of these efforts remains dependent upon the combination of enforcement and public compliance.

Summary

The dangers of using mobile phones while driving are multifaceted, encompassing not only the immediate risk of accidents but also the legal consequences. It is indeed illegal, as stipulated by the Anti-Distracted Driving Act. Creating a safer road environment requires a collective effort, including strict enforcement of existing laws, public education, and the adoption of responsible driving practices. It is important for drivers to be aware of the legal consequences and, more importantly, the potential dangers associated with using mobile phones while driving.

As technology advances, the conversation surrounding distracted driving continues to evolve, prompting policymakers to reassess and update regulations to keep up with emerging trends and challenges. On the other hand, drivers are expected to foster a culture of responsible driving, by prioritizing safety, adhering to traffic regulations, and staying informed about the laws governing mobile phone usage on the road. The law is a testament to the government’s commitment to ensuring the safety of all road users in the country.